Machinery pre starts


Machinery Pre Starts
Unlimited, ready-to-go digital pre starts
with our free pre start app
Risk management and corrective actions
Risk Management &
Corrective Actions

Know the hazards and how to control
them with our automated risk
management reports
Document management and audit trail
Document Management
& Audit Trail

Leave paper-based systems behind and
manage and store crucial compliance
information digitally
Dashboards and reporting
Dashboards & Reporting
Get information and insights on the
compliance status across your fleet
and sites



    Machinery Risk Assessments


    Machinery Risk Assessments
    Industry leading and specific to your
    machines. Powered by the Machinery Compliance Engine (MCE)
    Service and maintenance management
    Service & Maintenance

    Keep your machines in top condition
    with a preventative maintenance
    Safe Operating Procedures

    Access easy-to-read, comprehensive
    SOPs specific to your machines
    MySite subcontractor machinery management
    All the tools to manage machinery
    compliance obligations and uphold
    safety on-site
    View All Features
      See how we can help
      transform your business
      See Ideagen Plant Assessor in action


            Case Studies
            Hear from our clients
            Find us at industry events
            Find industry-specific guides
            Educational content
            News & Articles
            Industry news and articles
              Safety Legislation
              We keep up with safety legislation
              so you don't have to
              Find overviews and informative
              videos here
              View upcoming and on-demand webinars
              See our current promotions
                Improve your machinery compliance gaps
                Complete our Machinery Safety System Health Check to receive a free personalised report on how to improve your compliance gaps.

                HEALTH CHECK


                  All of our frequently asked questions
                  Knowledge Base
                  How to use our software
                  View a Demo
                  Let us walk you through Ideagen Plant Assessor features
                  Release Centre
                  Product updates and release information
                      We are here to help
                      Have a question about the Ideagen Plant Assessor platform? Speak to our friendly support team.

                      CONTACT US


                        2 min read

                        Update: Are we ignoring AS5327:2019? | Plant Assessor

                        Update: Are we ignoring AS5327:2019? | Plant Assessor

                        In August we published an article regarding the then recently published AS5327:2019 Earthmoving Machinery – Access Systems. Whilst there is no change to the approach that Plant Assessor is taking to this standard I should have included more detail in my article around the exact differences between ISO2867:2011 Earthmoving Machinery – Access Systems and AS5327:2019 Earthmoving Machinery – Access Systems.


                        Before we get into the details of this update there are a few points worth making – 

                        • It is important to note that AS5327 could be viewed as an intermediary standard as it is expected that ISO2867 will be reviewed in the next 2 to 3 years. That revision will influence future versions of AS5327.

                        • The authors have attempted to be all things to all people in many ways as there is no other guidance as specific as this available.

                        • This update is based on questions and feedback from readers of the first article.


                        AS5327 includes Appendix ZZ. This appendix contains the differences between the ISO version and the AS version. Interestingly, the draft version of AS5327 did not include such an appendix but rather replaced the ISO clauses with the Australian versions in the body of the standard. It is a matter of personal opinion as to whether you like this approach. 

                        The clause at the centre of my previous article is 6.2.3. 


                        Below is clause 6.2.3 as it appears in ISO2867, in the main body of AS5327 and in my article in August


                        Below is the version of clause 6.2.3 as it appears in AS5327 appendix ZZ – 


                        The questions for us are, what is the difference and does it make a difference?

                        For me, there is in reality no difference. ISO2867 requires guardrails for all platforms above 3m and platforms above 2m where the platform is less than 1.5m from an edge 2m. It is extremely rare that a platform is greater than 1.5m from the edge of a machine. This means that in reality ISO2867 requires guardrails for all platforms above 2m as does AS5327.

                        AS5327 does add an additional requirement in NOTE 1. Note 1 states – For heights below 2m alternative protective measures should be implemented where a significant risk of fall exists.

                        I can see that the intention of this additional information in note 1 is to provide additional guidance, however in reality it is subjective, confusing and arguably misleading. Let me explain. 

                        Firstly, the use of the word “should” not “shall’ means that the requirement is recommended but not mandatory. 

                        Secondly, it requires designers, manufacturers, suppliers and users of machines to determine whether a “significant risk” exists and then to determine the alternative protective measure to be implemented. This is a very subjective process. One that Plant Assessor removes for our users every day. 

                        Lastly, the use of the word “alternative” both states and implies that a guard rail should not be implemented below 2m. Under the Australian WHS laws and the risk assessment process there are times where a guardrail is the appropriate method of controlling the risk of falling. 

                        As mentioned at the start, Plant Assessor will not be changing its approach to this requirement.
                        This update was to clarify in more detail the difference between ISO3867 and AS5327. 

                        As always, Plant Assessor customers can ask me a question regarding standards or legislative obligations anytime, simply email your question to and they will be answered in this section of the newsletter each month.


                        Disclaimer: This information is intended to provide general information on the subject matter. This is not intended as legal or expert advice for your specific situation. You should seek professional advice before acting or relying on the content of this information.

                        8 tips for implementing machinery safety systems

                        8 tips for implementing machinery safety systems

                        Ensuring your fleet of machinery is compliant with legislation and managing the risks of machinery hazards can aid in keeping your people and...

                        Read More
                        $50,000 fine for preventable boom pump death

                        $50,000 fine for preventable boom pump death

                        A Victorian concrete pumping company has been sentenced following the death of a worker as a result of a boom pump failure.

                        Read More
                        The ultimate guide to machinery risk assessments

                        The ultimate guide to machinery risk assessments

                        Welcome to Ideagen Plant Assessor’s ultimate guide to machinery risk assessments! In today's fast-paced workplace environments, the proper assessment...

                        Read More